In reality, China, as the second-largest source of U.S. imports, supplies high-quality, competitively priced goods that have helped fill store shelves, ease inflation and deliver real savings to American consumers.

by Mei Xing

Recently, there has been an argument about the so-called "China shock" being the reason for job losses in the United States. But a more nuanced approach is necessary to explain the contraction of manufacturing jobs in the United States, including the overall economic dynamics in developed countries, automation and a combination of domestic factors.

GLOBAL MANUFACTURING DECLINE

The Groningen Growth and Development Centre in the Netherlands finds that manufacturing employment typically follows an inverse U-shape: it rises during early industrialization but declines as economies advance and consumer demand shifts toward services. This leads to a gradual movement of labor from manufacturing into the service sector. Take the United States itself for example:

In 1950, goods accounted for around 60 percent of American consumption; today they represent just a third of spending and just 10 percent of national jobs.

According to a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), manufacturing job losses in developed economies began well before China joined the WTO in 2001.

A 2025 JPMorgan analysis also indicates that this structural shift occurred regardless of trade deficits, noting similar drops in countries like Germany and Japan -- both of which consistently ran trade surpluses.

AUTOMATION DRIVES LOSSES

Automation, not trade, has been the main driver of manufacturing job losses in the United States, as pointed out in a recent op-ed by Nobel Laureate James J. Heckman and economics professor at the University of Pennsylvania Hanming Fang.

Research also shows that the adoption of industrial robots in the United States from 1990 to 2007 led to a loss of 360,000 to 670,000 jobs. So, even if the United States completely stops importing from China, many jobs will still be replaced by robots.

A number of solid research pieces also make the same case:

Professors at Ball State University in Indiana pointed out that between 2000 and 2010, only about 13 percent of U.S. manufacturing job losses could be attributed to international trade, with the remaining driven by productivity gains (automation, efficiency and technology improvements).

Recent AEI research suggests that manufacturing job shrinkage has been driven largely by productivity gains rather than offshoring alone: from 2001 to 2024, U.S. manufacturing employment fell by approximately 22 percent, but real manufacturing output increased by about 40-50 percent over the same period.

DOMESTIC JOB PRESSURES

Higher costs of labor: Per capita wages per hour in the United States are six to eight times higher than those of emerging markets.

Tariff hikes can backfire: Although high steel tariffs delivered modest gains to U.S. steelmakers, downstream manufacturing sectors -- such as auto, appliance and machinery industries -- faced much higher costs, leading to significant job losses across those industries.

Domestic, interstate shifts of manufacturing jobs: A study by Middlebury College recently emphasized that manufacturing jobs lost in the Rust Belt in the United States weren't offshored overseas but relocated to Southern states such as Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee. This means that it is unfair to put the blame completely on other countries.

Reluctance to take factory jobs and a lack of skilled labor: According to a 2024 Cato Institute survey, only 25 percent of Americans said they'd personally be better off working in a factory -- even though 80 percent favored more manufacturing jobs nationally.

The Alliance for American Manufacturing reports that by early 2025, around 20.6 percent of U.S. factories were operating below capacity due to labor shortages. Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Labor noted approximately 381,000 unfilled manufacturing positions in April 2025.

It is therefore both inaccurate and unconstructive to scapegoat China for employment challenges in the United States.

In reality, China, as the second-largest source of U.S. imports, supplies high-quality, competitively priced goods that have helped fill store shelves, ease inflation and deliver real savings to American consumers.

China is also the third-largest market for U.S. exports: roughly 50 percent of American soybean exports, 30 percent of cotton exports, 17 percent of integrated circuit exports, 10 percent of U.S. exports of coal, liquefied petroleum gas and medical equipment go to China -- collectively supporting around 860,000 American jobs.

Editor's note: Mei Xing is an observer of international affairs.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of Xinhua News Agency.